Petitioner challenged the compliance of an RTI request. Court noted that the information authority provided proceeding books and photocopies for the requested period. Petitioner argued information was deficient. Court observed the order appeared complied.
Writ petition disposed of. No costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 980-wp 7390-2021.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 7390 OF 2021
Shri Valmik Rajaram Garudkar
.. Petitioner
Versus
The State of Maharashtra and others
.. Respondents
Mr. Rajendra S. Kasar, Advocate for the Petitioner.
Mr. P. K. Lakhotiya, AGP for Respondent No. 1.
Mr. V. D. Patnoorkar, Advocate for Respondent No. 4.
CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA &
R. N. LADDHA, JJ.
DATED : 29th September, 2021.
PER COURT:-
.It is submitted by Mr. Patnoorkar, learned counsel that the
information as sought is provided by the information authority on
07.09.2021 for the period 1970 to 2021. The proceeding books from
the year 1970 to 2021 are made available to the petitioner. About 280
photocopy pages from the registers as the petitioner found relevant
were also given to him and in respect of Namuna No. 1 Demand
Register, 43 pages were given as required by the petitioner.
2. It appears that the order is complied.
3. According to Mr. Kasar, learned counsel for the petitioner, the
information given is not complete information and the information is
deficient.
1 of 2
2 980-wp 7390-2021.odt
4. In case, the information as sought and directed by the State Information Commission is not given, the petitioner is at liberty to take up appropriate steps.
5. Writ petition is disposed of. No costs.
( R. N. LADDHA ) ( S. V. GANGAPURWALA ) JUDGE JUDGEP.S.B.
2 of 2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the information furnished by the public authority was complete and sufficient under the RTI Act.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Shri Valmik Rajaram Garudkar
The State of Maharashtra
S. V. Gangapurwala
R. N. Laddha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court