The High Court at Aurangabad dismissed a writ petition as withdrawn by the learned counsel on instructions, ordering no costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
981 wp.5755.21.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD.
981 WRIT PETITION NO.5755 OF 2021
JAI TULJA BHAWANI SHIKSHAN PRASARAK MANDAL, THROUGH ITS SECRETARY AND OTHERS VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
Advocate for Petitioners : Mr. Vikram S. Kadam. AGP for Respondent/State: Mrs. M. A. Deshpande. Advocate for Respondent No.3 : Mr. Rahul A. Tambe.
CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA & R. N. LADDHA, JJ. DATE : 28th September, 2021.
P.C.:
. The learned counsel for petitioners, on instructions, seeks leave
to withdraw the writ petition.
2 The writ petition is disposed of as withdrawn. No costs.
[ R. N. LADDHA, J. ] [ S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J. ]
nga
Jai Tulja Bhawani Shikshan Prasarak Mandal
The State of Maharashtra
S. V. Gangapurwala
R. N. Laddha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
