The High Court disposed of Criminal Writ Petition No. 688 of 2021 filed by the petitioner, who is the complainant. The court accepted that a representation sought inclusion of Section 120B IPC and that this has been done, rendering the petition devoid of cause.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
JPP
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 688 OF 2021
Kailash K. Agarwal … Petitioner
V/s.
The State of Maharashtra and Ors.
... Respondents
Mr. Nitin Patil for the Petitioner Ms. A.S. Pai, P.P. for the Respondent – State
CORAM : NITIN JAMDAR & SARANG V. KOTWAL, JJ.
DATE : 3 DECEMBER 2021
P.C. :-
The Petitioner has sought a direction to the Respondents to decide and adjudicate upon the letter issued by the Petitioner to the Respondents.
2
SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.
NITIN JAMDAR, J.
Digitally signed JYOTI by JYOTI PRAKASH PRAKASH PAWAR PAWAR Date: 2021.12.06 11:27:45 +0530
Kailash K. Agarwal
The State of Maharashtra
Nitin Jamdar
Sarang V. Kotwal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
