In a writ petition, the Bombay High Court directed respondent authorities to decide within eight weeks on a proposal to include the petitioner's name in the Shalarth Pranali list as a Jr. Clerk.
Directed respondent authorities to decide within eight weeks on the proposal to place the petitioner's name in the Shalarth Pranali.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
.. 1 ..
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
1032 WRIT PETITION NO.6682 OF 2021
BALASAHEB AASRAJI PATIL
.. Petitioner
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
..Respondents
Advocate for Petitioner : Mr Rakesh C. Bramhankar
AGP for Respondents / State : Mr S.P. Tiwari
CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA & R.N. LADDHA, JJ.
DATE : 13-08-2021
PER COURT : -
1.The learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the
petitioner is appointed as a Jr. Clerk in the year 2009. Thereafter, he
has become permanent. The appointment of the petitioner is also
approved on 07-01-2013. The proposal is given to include the name
of the petitioner in the Shalarth Pranali, but the decision has not
been taken upon it as yet.
2.We direct the respondent authorities to take decision upon the
proposal, if any, pending before them qua placing the petitioner’s
name in the Shalarth Pranali, preferably within eight weeks.
3.Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs.
[ R.N. LADDHA ] [ S. V. GANGAPURWALA ]
JUDGE JUDGE
Gajanan
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner's proposal for inclusion in Shalarth Pranali should be decided by respondent authorities.
BALASAHEB AASRAJI PATIL
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
S. V. GANGAPURWALA
R.N. LADDHA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court