The High Court dismissed two writ petitions maintaining that petitioners have an alternative remedy before the Central Administrative Tribunal. The writs were disposed of with liberty to approach the competent tribunal.
Writ petitions disposed of with liberty to petitioners to avail alternate remedy before Central Administrative Tribunal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
(1)
1016-wp-4719-2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
1016 WRIT PETITION NO.4719 OF 2021
RASHID SHA KABIR SHA ..PETITIONER
VERSUS
THE UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS..RESPONDENTS
AND
WRIT PETITION NO.4622 OF 2021
SAYYAD RASHID S/O SAYYAD NOOR..PETITIONER
VERSUS
THE UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS..RESPONDENTS
Mr. Nitinkumar C. Swami, Advocate for the
Petitioners.
Mr. A. G. Talhar, ASG for Respondent Nos.1 to 4.
CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA &
R. N. LADDHA, JJ.
DATED : 12th AUGUST, 2021.
PER COURT:-
1.We have heard learned counsel for
petitioners.
2.Mr. Talhar, learned ASG for respondents
raises a preliminary objection that petitioners
have remedy before the Central Administrative
Tribunal.
3.In light of that, Writ Petitions are
disposed of with liberty to petitioners to avail
(2) 1016-wp-4719-2021
the alternate remedy as may be permissible under
law.
4. All contentions are kept open. No costs.
(R. N. LADDHA) (S. V. GANGAPURWALA)
JUDGE JUDGE
Devendra/August-2021
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioners can maintain writ petitions when an alternative remedy exists before the Central Administrative Tribunal.
RASHID SHA KABIR SHA
SAYYAD RASHID S/O SAYYAD NOOR
THE UNION OF INDIA
S. V. GANGAPURWALA
R. N. LADDHA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court