Allowed

M/S. Balaji Enterprise through Proprietor Pawan Udhavdas Budhrani and Anr. v. the Konark Urban Co-Op. Bank and Ors.

Bombay HC13 Oct 2021WP/6641/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The petition for judicial review concerning a working capital loan was allowed to be withdrawn by the petitioner after the respondent bank officer undertook to return the subject documents upon withdrawal. The writ was disposed of with an order to list for compliance.

What did the court decide?

The writ petition was allowed to be withdrawn and disposed of.

M/S. Balaji Enterprise through Proprietor Pawan Udhavdas… — Banking and Recovery | Bombay HC (2021)

¶1

Digitally PRASHANTVILASRANE signed byPRASHANTVILAS RANEDate:2021.10.14 22:17:47 +0530

3wp6641-21

pvr

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶6

WRIT PETITION NO.6641 OF 2021

¶7

Ms.Balaji Agency & Anr. Vs.

¶8

… Petitioners

¶9

The Konark Urban Co-op. Bank.& Ors.… Respondents

¶10

Ms.Sakina Kothari i/b. Ms.Kranti S.S.Anand, for the Petitioners.

¶11

Mr.Bharat P Gerela, Officer of the Konark Urban Co-op.Bank Ltd, Ulhasnagar,
present.

¶12

CORAM : G.S. KULKARNI, J.

¶13

DATE : 13^th October, 2021

¶14

P.C.:

¶15

1.In pursuance of the earlier order passed by this Court, Mr.Bharat P
Gerela, the officer of respondent no.1-the Konark Urban Co-op.Bank,
Ulhasnagar, is present in the Court. Mr.Bharat P Gerela makes a statement that
on the petitioners withdrawing his petition, all the documents, the subject
matter of the working capital loan, would be returned to the petitioners.
Statement as made by Mr.Bharat P. Gerela, Officer of the Konark Urban Co-
op.Bank Ltd. is accepted as an undertaking to this Court. On such assurance,
learned Counsel for the petitioners, on instructions from the petitioner who is
present in the Court, seeks leave to withdraw this petition.

¶16

2. Allowed to be withdrawn.

¶17

3. Disposed of. No costs.

¶18

4. List this petition on 20 October 2021 at 10.30 a.m. to report compliance by respondent no.1.

¶19

5.Mr.Bharat P Gerela, the officer of respondent no.1-the Konark Urban
Co-op.Bank, Ulhasnagar shall also remain present on the adjourned date of
hearing to report compliance.

¶20

 (G.S. KULKARNI, J.)

M/S. Balaji Enterprise through Proprietor Pawan Udhavdas Budhrani and Anr. v. the Konark Urban Co-Op. Bank and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/S. Balaji Enterprise through Proprietor Pawan Udhavdas Budhrani and Anr. v. the Konark Urban Co-Op. Bank and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kasim Mahommad Mahajan and Ors. Vs Babalal @ Ahmadkhan Sultan Mahajan (Since Decd.) through Lrs. and Ors.

Roseline Fedrick Dsouza Vs Grievance Redressal Committee, Mumbai Suburban and Others

Shri. Thorat Prabhakar Subrao Vs State of Maharashtra Thru Divisional Commissioner, Pune Div. and Ors.

M/S. Kataria Jadhavar Associates Vs the State of Maharashtra Thru Prin. Secretary, Dept. of Revenue and Ors.

Navrang Dyeing Pvt. Ltd. Vs Mah. Mathadi Shramjeevi Kamgar and General Union and Anr.

Ullengal Brothers Textile Pvt. Ltd. Vs Mah. Mathadi Shramjeevi Kamgar and General Union and Anr.