The petitioner filed a writ petition which was withdrawn by him. The court dismissed the petition accordingly and vacated any interim order that might have been passed.
The writ petition stood dismissed as withdrawn; interim order, if any, stands vacated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1.WPNo.66132009
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.6613 OF 2009
Sadashiv Ramchandra Patil ... Petitioner versus The Additional Collector & Competent Authority & Anr. ... Respondents
Mr.Samir A. Vaidya, Advocate for the Petitioner.
Smt.N.M.Mehra, AGP for the Respondent/State.
CORAM :- DIPANKAR DATTA, CJ & G. S. KULKARNI, J.
DATE :- JULY 1, 2021
PC :
1 Mr.Vaidya, learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that he has instruction to withdraw the writ petition.
2 The writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
(G. S. KULKARNI, J.) (CHIEF JUSTICE)
1/1
Gaikwad RD
Sadashiv Ramchandra Patil
The Additional Collector & Competent Authority & Anr.
Dipankar Datta
G. S. Kulkarni
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
