The writ petition filed by the petitioner was allowed to be withdrawn with no order as to costs. The matter was disposed of accordingly.
Writ petition allowed to be withdrawn. Disposed of as withdrawn. No costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
6-wp 2172-21.docx
`Prajakta Vartak IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.2172 OF 2021
Bramha Corp Limited ...Petitioner vs. The State of Maharashtra & Ors. ...Respondents
Mr.Siddhartha Ronghe for the Petitioner. Mr.P.P. Kakade, GP for the State. Mr.Abhijeet Kulkarni for PMC.
CORAM :- DIPANKAR DATTA, CJ & G. S. KULKARNI, J.
DATE :- JUNE 24, 2021
PC :
instructions of the petitioner, seeks leave to withdraw the writ petition.
(G. S. KULKARNI, J.) (CHIEF JUSTICE)
1/1
Bramha Corp Limited
The State of Maharashtra
Dipankar Datta
G. S. Kulkarni
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
