Partly allowed

Shamsundar Munde Pratishthan through Its President Dattatraya Vitthalrao Balutkar v. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Bombay HC14 Sept 2021WP/6078/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Bombay Bench at Aurangabad partly allowed a writ petition seeking to quash a communication denying scholarship fee reimbursement to nursing students. The Court quashed the impugned order and directed the respondent to furnish the student list by September 30, 2021, to finalize the decision by November 30, 2021.

What did the court decide?

Impugned communication dated 23/07/2014 quashed. Petitioner directed to furnish student list by Sep 30, 2021; Respondent directed to finalize decision by Nov 30, 2021.

Shamsundar Munde Pratishthan through Its… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Bombay HC (2021)

¶1

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD

¶3

WRIT PETITION NO.6078 OF 2020

¶4

SHAMSUNDAR MUNDE PRATISHTHAN THROUGH IT’S PRESIDENT
DATTATRAYA VITTHALRAO BALUTKAR

¶5

VERSUS

¶6

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

¶7

Mr.S.S.Thombre, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr.S.B.Yawalkar, AGP for respondent Nos. 1 to 6.

¶8

 DATE : SEPTEMBER 14, 2021

¶9

PER COURT:

¶10

1.Having heard the learned Advocates for the respective sides, we
have perused the judgment dated 06/12/2018 delivered by this Court
in WP No.4035/2018 filed by Shri Bhagwanbaba Sevabhavi Sanstha’s,
Mauli Nursing School Vs. State of Maharashtra and other connected
petitions.

¶11

2. There is no dispute that this judgment laying down the law on reimbursement of scholarship amounts for a particular category of employees, was delivered on 06/12/2018 and the impugned communication denying fee reimbursement of scholarship to the khs/Sept. 2021/6078-d

¶12

- 2 -

¶13

students of Nursing Courses was issued on 23/07/2014, knowledge of
which was derived by the petitioner for the first time in 2019.
Therefore, the petitioner rushed to this Court on 16/06/2019.

¶14

3.In view of the above, the learned AGP submits that the petitioner
will have to refurnish the list of students for the Nursing Courses for the
academic year 2011-2012 and 2012-2013, so as to be considered within
the ambit of the judgment dated 06/12/2018 (supra).

¶15

4.As such, this petition is partly allowed. The impugned
communication dated 23/07/2014 is quashed and set aside.

¶16

5.The petitioner shall furnish the list of the students with reference
to reimbursement of their scholarship amounts for the above mentioned
academic years of the nursing courses, to respondent No.4, on or before
30/09/2021. Respondent No.4 shall then formalize it’s decision in the
light of the law laid down in the judgment in Shri Bhagwanbaba
(supra), as expeditiously as possible and in any case on or before
30/11/2021.

¶17

 ( S.G. MEHARE, J. ) ( RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J. )

¶18

khs/Sept. 2021/6078-d

Shamsundar Munde Pratishthan through Its President Dattatraya Vitthalrao Balutkar v. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shamsundar Munde Pratishthan through Its President Dattatraya Vitthalrao Balutkar v. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mahesh Madhukar Thombre Vs the Chairman, Life Insurance Corporation of India and Others

Dnyaneshwar Bhausaheb Narwate Vs the State of Maharashtra through Secretary and Others

Sagar Ashok Pachunde Vs Kavita Sagar Pachunde

Dr Sayanna Piraji Mathamwar Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Sandip Prakash Thorat Vs the Union of India and Others

Tukaram Supdu Chaudhari Died Thr Lrs Raman Tukaram Chaudhari Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others