The High Court condoned a 210-day delay in filing cross objections and allowed the applicant husband liberty to place subsequent documents on record in family court proceedings.
Condonation of 210 days delay for filing cross objections and liberty to place additional documents on record.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
ca1800.20, etc
(1)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1800 OF 2020 IN CROSS OBJECTION NO.5866 OF 2020 IN FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO.32 OF 2019
WITH
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.835 OF 2020 IN
FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO.32 OF 2019
SAGAR ASHOK PACHUNDE
VERSUS
KAVITA SAGAR PACHUNDE
Mr P.M. Gaikwad, Advocate for applicant in CA No.1800/2020 Mr A.S. Shelke, Advocate for respondent in both CAs; Mr G.G. Suryawanshi, Advocate for applicant in CA No.835/2020
CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE AND S. G. MEHARE, JJ.
DATE : 9th September, 2021
PER COURT:
of the proceedings, this Civil Application is allowed. Delay of 210 days is condoned. The Cross Objections may be registered.
ca1800.20, etc
(2)
(S. G. MEHARE, J.)
(RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.)
amj
2 issues framed by the court
Whether to condone a 210-day delay in filing cross objections in a family court appeal.
Whether to grant liberty to place additional documents pertaining to subsequent events on record.
Sagar Ashok Pachunde
Kavita Sagar Pachunde
Ravindra V. Ghuge
S. G. Mehare
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
