The petitioner, having failed to deposit the amount directed by an interim order, sought leave to withdraw the writ petition. The petition was dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT AT BOMBAY APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD
989 WRIT PETITION NO.6015 OF 2021
AHMED AYYUB SHAH
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER
Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. Pathan Yunus Basheer AGP for Respondent State : Mr. K.N. Lokhande Advocate for Respondent 2 : Mr. U.N. Shete
CORAM : S.V. GANGAPURWALA & R.N. LADDHA, JJ. DATED : 14/07/2021.
PER COURT :
. The petitioner failed to deposit the amount as directed by this Court under order dated 7th of April 2021. The petitioner enjoyed the interim orders of this Court from 7th April 2021. Now the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the writ petition. It is only to avoid the payment as directed by this Court the petitioner now seeks leave to withdraw the petition.
[ R.N. LADDHA, J. ]
[S.V. GANGAPURWALA, J.]
ssc/
Ahmed Ayyub Shah
The State of Maharashtra
Another
S.V. Gangapurwala
R.N. Laddha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
