Madhukar Shankar Dasale v. Subhash Shankar Desale
Case brief
What is this about?
Writ petition disposed of as rendered infructuous due to developments in the interim. No substantive findings.
What did the court decide?
None
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 5995 OF 2011
MADHUKAR SHANKAR DASALE VERSUS SUBHASH SHANKAR DESALE
... Mr. N.N. Desale, Advocate for petitioners None present for respondent though served
CORAM : SUNIL P. DESHMUKH, J. DATE : 05-01-2021
ORDER :
1. Learned counsel for petitioner, on instructions, states
that with further developments taking place in the interregnum, the
matter has been rendered infructuous .
[SUNIL P. DESHMUKH] JUDGE
arp/
MADHUKAR SHANKAR DASALE
SUBHASH SHANKAR DESALE
SUNIL P. DESHMUKH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court