Petitioner's counsel stated the matter was rendered infructuous by passage of time. The court disposed of the writ petition accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 1733 OF 2012
WAGHUR PARISAR MASCHYA VYAVSAIK SAHAKARI SANSTHA LTD. VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
Mr. G.R. Nagargoje, Advocate h/f. Mr. R.T. Nagargoje, Advocate for petitioners Mr. S.P. Sonpawale, AGP for respondent – State Mr. V.B. Patil, Advocate for respondent no. 6
CORAM : SUNIL P. DESHMUKH, J. DATE : 05-01-2021
ORDER :
that with the passage of time, the matter has been rendered infructuous .
[SUNIL P. DESHMUKH] JUDGE
arp/
WAGHUR PARISAR MASCHYA VYAVSAIK SANSTHA LTD
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
SUNIL P. DESHMUKH
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
