Oral order where the court withdrew the petition noting that the grievance regarding registration of a draft Sale Deed was fulfilled by an earlier order of the same court.
Writ Petition closed with no further relief granted pending authority rules on registration.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
2-wp-58-2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA
WRIT PETITION NO.58 OF 2021
SATISH NAGURE ….PETITIONER
Versus
THE CIVIL CUM SUB REGISTRAR AND NOTARY EXOFFICIO, MAPUSA AND 2 ORS.
... RESPONDENTS
Shri S.M. Walwaikar, Advocate for the Petitioner. Shri G. Shetye, Additional Government Advocate for the Respondent No.3.
Coram:- DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU, J.
Date:- 24 February 2021
ORAL ORDER :
Now, the learned counsel for the petitioner and also the learned Additional Government Advocate report to the Court that in view of the later developments in the matter, especially after this Court passed its order on 03.02.2021, nothing further survives in this petition. That is, the grievance raised in this Writ Petition to the extent that the respondent-authority should receive the draft Sale Deed for registration stands fulfilled. Of course, it is for the authorities to rule whether the document can be registered. Leaving that option open, I close this Writ Petition.
DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU, J.
NH
Digitally signed by NITI K NITI K HALDANKAR HALDANKAR Date: 2021.02.25 15:13:49 +05'30'
SATISH NAGURE
THE CIVIL CUM SUB REGISTRAR AND NOTARY EXOFFICIO, MAPUSA AND 2 ORS.
DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
