Order allowing amendment of wrongful respondent's name and granting leave to serve notice at correct addresses.
Amendment of the application to correct the respondent's name was allowed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
MCA 127 2020
IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA
MCA/127/2020
MARIA PERPETUA ARLETA
FERNANDES AND ANR., …... APPLICANT
VS
VITO ANTONIO
FERNANDES AND 2 ORS …... RESPONDENTS
Ms. K. Gracias, Advocate for the Applicant. Mr. R. Kantak, Advocate for the Respondent no.1.
CORAM: DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU, J. Date: 6th March, 2021
ORDER:
It seems that the petitioners have shown the second respondent's name wrongly. Now, they have come up with this application for amending the name.
the respondent nos. 2 and 3. They seek the Court's leave for serving notice to those addresses.
2
MCA 127 2020
DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU, J.
AP/-
MARIA Digitally signed by MARIA AURA AURA PEREIRA Date: 2021.03.06 PEREIRA 10:34:54 +05'30'
MARIA PERPETUA ARLETA FERNANDES
VITO ANTONIO FERNANDES
Respondent no.2
Respondent no.3
DAMA SESHADRI NAIDU
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
