Dismissed

Suvarna Kawduji Raut v. Scheduled Tribes Caste Certificate Scrutiny Committee, Amravati Thr. Member Secretary and Another

Bombay HC4 Feb 2021WP/570/2021

Download

Case brief

from the order text

What is this about?

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY…

What the court decided

AI extract

Suvarna Kawduji Raut Vs Scheduled Tribes Caste Certificate Scrutiny Committee, Amravati Thr. Member Secretary and Another — Bombay HC (2021) — LawSathi Research

¶1

29-WP-570-21.odt

¶2

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR

¶4

Writ Petition No. 570 of 2021

¶5

Ku. Suvarna Kuwduji Raut

¶6

... Petitioner

¶7

Versus

¶8

The Scheduled Tribes Caste Certificate Scrutiny Committee and another

¶9

... Respondents

¶10

Shri R. S. Parsodkar, Advocate for the Petitioner. Shri A. M. Deshpande, Addl. GP for Respondent No.1.

¶11

CORAM : NITIN JAMDAR AND ANIL S. KILOR, JJ. DATED : 04 FEBRUARY 2021

¶12

P.C. :

¶13

This Petition is filed for a direction to the Respondent - Scrutiny Committee to decide the caste claim of the Petitioner within a specific period. The challenge is also raised to the communication dated 11 January 2021 issued by the employer of the Petitioner that if the Validity Certificate is not granted, Petitioner's services will be terminated.

¶14

Choulwar

¶15

2 29-WP-570-21.odt

¶16

It appears to us that the communication dated 11 January 2021 proceeds on misreading of the order passed by this Court. This Court while directing in Writ Petition No.1882/2017 on 23 July 2019, had remitted the matter back to the Committee for verification and directed the Committee to decide the matter within a period of six months. However, the directions for protection of the services of the Petitioner was not restricted to six months, but was to operate till the decision of the Scrutiny Committee. The Petitioner, however, has not drawn the attention of the Respondent - Employer to this part of the order while making a written communication. We also take note of the statement made by the learned AGP for the Respondent No.1 that the proceedings before the Scrutiny Committee is finally heard and the orders are awaited.

¶17

Granting liberty to the Petitioner to inform the employer and to apprise it of the order passed on 23 July 2019, we dispose of the Petition.

¶18

[ANIL S. KILOR, J.]

¶19

[NITIN JAMDAR, J.]

¶20

Digitally signed by Vithal Vithal Choulwar Choulwar Date: 2021.02.1018:58:47 +0530

¶21

Choulwar

Suvarna Kawduji Raut v. Scheduled Tribes Caste Certificate Scrutiny Committee, Amravati Thr. Member Secretary and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

Suvarna Kawduji Raut v. Scheduled Tribes Caste Certificate Scrutiny Committee, Amravati Thr. Member Secretary and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Vaidyakiya Jan Jagruti Manch, Thr. President, Dr. Sachin Sureshreao Pawade Vs the State of Maharashtra, Thr. Secretary Deptt. of Medical Education and Drugs, Mumbai and Others

Kavita D/O Haridas Chavam (Kavita W/O Raju Dahake)) Vs State of Maha. Thr. Secretary, Food, Civil Supply and Consumer Protection Dept. Mumbai and Others

Smt. Bindu W/O. Ratnadip Bansod Vs the Zilla Parishad, Bhandara Thr. Chief Executive Officer, and Another

Agriculture Produce Marketing Committee, through Chairman, Shri Atul Gangadharao Ganyarpwar and 1 Vs State of Maharashtra, through Its Secretary, Co-Operation Marketing and Textile Department, Mumbai

Sushikshit Berojgar Abhiyanta Sanghatna Association, Thr. President, Anand Ajitkumar Jain, Gondia Vs the State of Maharashtra, Thr. Secretary, Public Work Department, Mumbai and Others

Abhishek Shrihari Deogade Vs the Scheduled Tribe Certificate Scrutiny Committee, Nagpur through Member Secretary and Others