Parties directed to settle a pending revision within two months; third-party interest in the subject property barred until such disposal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
(1)
951 WP-568.2021.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
951 WRIT PETITION NO.568 OF 2021 WITH CA/5660/2021 IN WP/568/2021
SAYYED AKHIL SAYYED ISMAIL AND ANOTHER VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
Smt. M.A. Kulkarni, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. S.W. Mundhe, A.G.P. for respondent Nos. 1 to 5. Mr. S.A. Ambad, Advocate for respondent No. 6.
CORAM : AVINASH G. GHAROTE, J. DATE : 30-07-2021.
ORDER :
(AVINASH G. GHAROTE, J.)
VD_Dhirde
Sayed Akhil Sayyed Ismail
The State of Maharashtra
Other
Respondent No. 2
Respondent No. 6
Avinash G. Gharote
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
