The High Court at Aurangabad dismissed a criminal remedy application as infructuous because the parties were found to be cohabiting together.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
31-MCA-26-2019.odt
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
31 Misc. Civil Application No.26 of 2019
Sonali w/o Shivnath @ Ganesh Jangam
VERSUS
Shivanath @ Ganesh s/o Ashok Jangam
Mr. Salve Anil B., Advocate for the Applicant
Mr. Deshmukh Rajeev B., Advocate for the Respondent/Sole
CORAM : AVINASH G. GHAROTE, J.
DATE : 28th July, 2021
PER COURT :
.Mr. Salve learned counsel for the applicant submits,
that the application has become infructuous as the parties are
cohabiting together. The statement is accepted. The application is,
therefore, dismissed as infructuous.
(AVINASH G. GHAROTE, J.)
Sameer
Sonali w/o Shivnath @ Ganesh Jangam
Shivanath @ Ganesh s/o Ashok Jangam
AVINASH G. GHAROTE
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court