Petitioner's writ petition disposed of. Court observed that vehicle was released per earlier order and noted imposition of penalty, allowing appeal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 wp 5054.21
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 5054 OF 2021
Madhav Marotirao Kadam .. Petitioner
Versus
The State of Maharashtra and others .. Respondents
Shri Rupesh A. Jaiswal, Advocate for the Petitioner. Shri S. P. Tiwari, A.G.P. for Respondent Nos. 1 to 4.
CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA AND R. N. LADDHA, JJ. DATE : 05TH OCTOBER, 2021.
FINAL ORDER :
. Mr. Jaiswal, the learned advocate for the petitioner submits that, pursuant to the order dated 27th August, 2021, the respondents have released the vehicle of the petitioner.
bsb/Oct.21
Madhav Marotirao Kadam
The State of Maharashtra
S. V. Gangapurwala
R. N. Laddha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
