Petitioner withdrew the writ petition without any substantive legal issue being decided.
Leave withdrawn and writ petition disposed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
1 wp.2198.19.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD.
1 WRIT PETITION NO.2198 OF 2019
NEHA JEEVAN KHALANE
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. Ajay D. Pawar. AGP for Respondent/State: Mr. S. P. Tiwari.
CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA & R. N. LADDHA, JJ. DATE : 04th October, 2021.
P.C.:
leave to withdraw the writ petition.
[ R. N. LADDHA, J. ] [ S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J. ]
nga
Neha Jeevan Khalane
The State of Maharashtra
S. V. Gangapurwala
R. N. Laddha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
