Commissioner of Central Excise, Mumbai-Iii v. P D Impex and 1 Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
of 1 J.V.Salunke,PS IN THE HIGH COURT OF
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
2-WP.209.2011
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 209 OF 2011
Commissioner of Central Excise, } Mumbai-III } Petitioner versus
P. D. Impex and Anr. } Respondents
Ms. Genevieve C. Fernandes for the petitioner.
CORAM :- DIPANKAR DATTA, CJ & MILIND N. JADHAV, J.
DATE :- DECEMBER 17, 2021
PC :-
1. Ms. Fernandes, learned advocate for the petitioner, on written instructions received from the Commissioner, CGST & CEx, Navi Mumbai, seeks leave to withdraw the writ petition.
2. The writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Commissioner of Central Excise
- respondent
P. D. Impex and Anr.
Coram
Dipankar Datta
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
Ms. Vimla T. Nainani and Anr. Vs Mr. Damodar Gulabrai Belani (Since Deceased Throuhg Lrs. and Anr.
Vinayak Narhar Joshi Decd Thru Lhr Vs M/S Pore Brothers and Anr.
Vaibhav S. Kapur Vs Suresh Gangaram Lohote and Ors.
Mehta Infocomm and Anr. Vs Additional Director General (Adjudication) Directorate of Revenue Initelligence and Ors.