An application disposed of as withdrawn at the instance of the petitioner had no remaining substantive content. There was no holding on law or precedent to extract.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
1802wp4574.19
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR
WRIT PETITION NO.4574 OF 2019
Sau. Bharti w/o Sudhir Nilgilwar
The State of Maharashtra and others
_____________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders Court's or Judge's orders or directions and Registrar's orders.
Shri V.N. Morande, Advocate for Petitioner. Shri D.P. Thakare, Additional Government Pleader for Respondent No.1.
CORAM : NITIN JAMDAR AND ANIL S. KILOR, JJ. DATE : 18 FEBRUARY 2021
Shri Morande, learned Counsel for the Petitioner, states that he has received instructions to withdraw the petition.
(ANIL S. KILOR, J.) (NITIN JAMDAR, J.)
khj
Digitally signed by Kamal Jeswani Date: 2021.02.24 11:34:37 +0530
Kamal Jeswani
2
1802wp4574.19
Sau. Bharti w/o Sudhir Nilgilwar
The State of Maharashtra
Nitin Jamdar
Anil S. Kilor
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
