Petitioner withdrew writ petition. AFFIDAVIT CONFIRMS WITHDRAWAL. DISPOSED WITHOUT SUBSTANTIVE DECISION. NO PRECEDENT VALUE BEYOND FACT OF WITHDRAWAL.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
902-wp-4392-21
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 4392 OF 2021
Santosh Laxman Niskate ..Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra ..Respondent
Ms. Saloni M. Ghule, (appointed Advocate) for Petitioner. Mr. J. P. Yagnik, APP for State/Respondent No.1.
__________ CORAM : NITIN JAMDAR AND SARANG V. KOTWAL, JJ. DATE : 4 DECEMBER 2021
P.C. :
. On 18 November 2021 the Petition was adjourned to enable the learned APP to take instructions.
(SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.)
(NITIN JAMDAR, J.)
Digitally signed by VINOD VINOD BHASKAR BHASKAR GOKHALE GOKHALE Date: 2021.12.04 17:19:26+0530 Gokhale
1 of 1
Santosh Laxman Niskate
The State of Maharashtra
Nitin Jamdar
Sarang V. Kotwal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court