Disposed

Amol S/O Chintaman Nasare v. the State of Maharashtra, through Its Secretary Public Works Department, Mumbai and Others

Bombay HC13 Oct 2021WP/4038/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner sought leave to withdraw a writ petition with liberty to seek redressal from the Maharashtra Administrative Tribunal. The court granted such leave and disposed of the petition.

What did the court decide?

Leave to withdraw petition with liberty to approach Maharashtra Administrative Tribunals was granted.

What the court decided

Amol S/O Chintaman Nasare Vs the State… — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Bombay HC (2021)

¶1

1 W.P.No.4038.2021

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR

¶3

WRIT PETITION NO. 4038 OF 2021

¶4

Shri Amol S/o Chintaman Nasare,

¶5

..VS..

¶6

The State of Maharashtra, through it’s Secretary, Public Works Department,
Mantralaya, Mumbai and Ors.,

¶7

Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, Court's or Judge's orders
appearances, Court's orders of directions
and Registrar's orders

¶8

Shri G. G. Bade, Advocate for petitioner.
Ms. Mayuri Deshmukh, A.G.P. for respondent Nos.1 to 3.

¶9

CORAM : SUNIL B. SHUKRE AND ANIL S. KILOR, JJ.

¶10

 DATED: 13.10.2021

¶11

1.Shri Bade, learned counsel for the petitioner, on
instructions, seeks leave of the Court to withdraw the
petition with liberty to approach the Maharashtra
Administrative Tribunal for redressal of the grievance of
the petitioner.

¶12

2. Leave with liberty as prayed for is granted.

¶13

3. The Writ Petition is disposed of accordingly. No

¶14

costs.

¶15

JUDGEJUDGE

¶16

Kirtak

Amol S/O Chintaman Nasare v. the State of Maharashtra, through Its Secretary Public Works Department, Mumbai and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Amol S/O Chintaman Nasare v. the State of Maharashtra, through Its Secretary Public Works Department, Mumbai and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Bhumiputra Shikshan Prasarak Sanstha, Amravati Thr. President Madhukarrao S. Lokhande and Another Vs State of Maharashtra, through Secretary, Department of Education, Mumbai and Others

Swayambhu Transport, a Proprietorship Firm, Thr. Namdeo Tukaram Bhapkar Vs Chandrapur City Municipal Corporation, Thr. Commissioner,Chandrapur

Aniket S/O Devendra Mate Vs Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. through Its Divisional Officer

Vandana D/O Tukaram Chandekar Vs Chief Executive Officer, Zilla Parishad, Gadchiroli and Others

Smt. Sumedha Wd/O Shridhar Ghatate Vs the State of Maha., through Its Sect. General Administration Dept., Mumbai and Others

Mr. Devanand Mahadev Tiple , Proprietor of Dev Enterprises Vs State of Maharashtra, Thr. Its Secretary, Ministry of Revenue and Forest Dept. Mumbai