Allowed

Aniket S/O Devendra Mate v. Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. through Its Divisional Officer

Bombay HC12 Oct 2021CAW/1068/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a miscellaneous civil application arising from a writ petition, the two-judge bench impleaded an amendment to the petition and disposed of the application by standing over the matter.

What did the court decide?

Amendment was allowed to be carried out on or before the next date with liberty to the respondent to file response; application disposed of by stand over.

Aniket S/O Devendra Mate Vs Indian Oil Corporation… — Writ and Judicial Review | Bombay HC (2021)

¶1

1 / 1 33-WP 664.2021

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR CIVIL APPLICATION (W) NO. 1068 OF 2021

¶3

IN

¶4

WRIT PETITION NO. 664 OF 2021

¶5

Aniket s/o Devendra Mate vs. Indian Oil Corporation Ltd.

¶6

Office notes, Office Memoranda of
Coram, appearances, Court's orders
or directions and Registrar's orders.

¶7

Court's or Judge's Orders.

¶8

Mr. Anand Parchure, Advocate for petitioner.
Mr. Rohit Joshi, Advocate for respondent.

¶9

CORAM :SUNIL B. SHUKRE AND
ANIL S. KILOR, JJ.
DATE :12/10/2021

¶10

Heard.

¶11

2.For the reasons stated in the application, the
same is allowed. Amendment to be carried out on or
before the next date. Copy of the amended petition be
furnished to the respondent with liberty to the respondent
to file appropriate response to the same.

¶12

3. Application is disposed of.

¶13

4. Stand over to two weeks .

¶14

JUDGE

¶15

JUDGE

¶16

KOLHE

Aniket S/O Devendra Mate v. Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. through Its Divisional Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Aniket S/O Devendra Mate v. Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. through Its Divisional Officer

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shri. Nilesh Kishorraoji Dhongde and Others Vs the State of Maharashtra,Thr. Its Secretary, Sports and Youth Services Dept. Ando Thers

Pushpa D/O Sakharam Ingale Vs Chief Executive Officer, Zilla Parishad, Buldana and Others

Prafulla S/O Ram Lanjewar Vs the State of Maha. Thr. Principal Secy., Dept. of Industries, Energy and Labour, Mumbai and Another

Bhumiputra Shikshan Prasarak Sanstha, Amravati Thr. President Madhukarrao S. Lokhande and Another Vs State of Maharashtra, through Secretary, Department of Education, Mumbai and Others

Swayambhu Transport, a Proprietorship Firm, Thr. Namdeo Tukaram Bhapkar Vs Chandrapur City Municipal Corporation, Thr. Commissioner,Chandrapur

Prerna Dinkar Chaudhari Vs Scheduled Tribes Caste Certificate Scrutiny Committee, Thr. Member Secretary, Amravati