Munaf Ibrahim Mujawar v. the State of Maharashtra and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
A criminal writ petition is disposed of as abated in favour of the State due to the expiration of the petitioner.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
08-wp-3585-21
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 3585 OF 2021
Munaf Ibrahim Mujawar ..Petitioner Versus
The State of Maharashtra & Anr.
..Respondents
Mr. Metanshu Purandare i/b. Aditya Raktade for Petitioner. Ms. M. H. Mhatre, APP for State/Respondent No.1.
CORAM : NITIN JAMDAR AND SARANG V. KOTWAL, JJ.
DATE : 13 DECEMBER 2021
P.C. :
. The learned counsel for the Petitioner states that the Petitioner has expired and, therefore, this Petition has abated.
Digitally signed by VINOD VINOD BHASKAR BHASKAR GOKHALE GOKHALE Date: 2021.12.15 14:31:35 +0530
(SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.)
Gokhale
(NITIN JAMDAR, J.)
1 of 1
Munaf Ibrahim Mujawar
The State of Maharashtra
Nitin Jamdar
Sarang V. Kotwal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court