Dismissed
Yunus Mehboob Nadaf v. the State of Maharashtra
Bombay HCWP/2835/2021
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY…
What the court decided
AI extract
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Digitally signed by SMITA SMITA JOHNSON JOHNSON GONSALVES GONSALVES Date: 2021.12.15 14:30:28+0530
5.wp2835-21.doc
1/2
sg
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.2835 OF 2021
Yunus Mehboob Nadaf .. Petitioner v/s. The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent
Mr. Vikrant Shivdas, a/w. Ms. Poonam Hatkar, i/b. Arvind Bhalerao, for the Petitioner.
Mr. K.V. Saste, APP, for Respondent State.
CORAM: NITIN JAMDAR & SARANG V. KOTWAL JJ.
DATE : 10 DECEMBER 2021.
P.C:-
This petition is filed with a prayer that Emergency (Covid - 19) Parole be granted to the Petitioner. The grounds in the petition are in furtherance of this prayer. However, to the petition, the Petitioner has annexed the order rejecting the application for furlough leave on 31 December 2019.
1 of 2
sg 2/2 5.wp2835-21.doc
year 2019, the Petitioner will apply again for furlough leave, and if the same is rejected, will file a petition. The learned APP states that as regards application for emergency parole, the same is also rejected. It is open to the Petitioner to challenge that order as well.
(SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.)
(NITIN JAMDAR, J.)
2 of 2
Yunus Mehboob Nadaf
The State of Maharashtra
Nitin Jamdar
Sarang V. Kotwal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court