This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 / 2 952-WP 356.2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR
WRIT PETITION NO. 356 OF 2021
Sangita Sushilkumar Agrawal -- Petitioner
vs.
National Highways Authority of India and others --Respondents
Mr. Naresh Kolhe, Advocate for the Petitioner. Ms. Ketaki Joshi, I/c. Government Pleader for the Respondent Nos.2, 3 and 4.
CORAM : NITIN JAMDAR & ANIL S. KILOR, JJ.
DATED : 19 JANUARY 2021
P. C. :
Heard the learned counsel for the Petitioner and the learned Government Pleader.
KOLHE
2 / 2 952-WP 356.2021
This aspect would entail a factual inquiry. The learned counsel for the Petitioner states that the factual aspects are placed before the Respondent – National Highway Authority by way of a representation made on 24 February 2020, which has not been answered.
[ ANIL S. KILOR, J. ] [ NITIN JAMDAR, J. ]
KOLHE
Sangita Sushilkumar Agrawal
National Highways Authority of India
NITIN JAMDAR
ANIL S. KILOR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
