Petitioner joined the offered post; no further grievance regarding the job. Petitioner's salary claim for intervening period was left open for future rejection by respondents. Petition disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
wp 1889.2020.odt
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR
Writ Petition No. 1889/2020
Ku Madhuri Kunjilal Ghodeswar
…Petitioner
Versus
Nav-Prabhat Shikshan Sanstha and ors.
...Respondents
Shri G.K. Bhusari, Advocate for the Petitioner Shri A.M. Deshpande, AGP for Respondent Nos. 3 to 6 - State
CORAM : NITIN JAMDAR AND ANIL S. KILOR, JJ.
DATED : 15 JANUARY 2021
P.C.:
At the out set, the learned Counsel for the Petitioner submits that the Petitioner has joined the post which was offered to the Petitioner by the Respondent No. 1 and there is no grievance as far as joining on the post is concerned. Therefore, the cause agitated in the Petition stands redressed.
[NITIN JAMDAR, J.]
[ANIL S. KILOR, J.]
SMGate
Ku Madhuri Kunjilal Ghodeswar
Nav-Prabhat Shikshan Sanstha
Nitin Jamdar
Anil S. Kilor
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
