Partly allowed

Dinkar Bhaskar Koli v. the State of Maharashtra Thr Its Secretary and Others

Bombay HC23 Feb 2021WP/3308/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The petitioner, facing a pending validation proceeding for a tribe claim, approached the High Court seeking protection against career-threatening actions. The Court directed the employer to not take adverse action solely due to the pending validation process, allowing further proceedings based on the Committee's final judgment, and scheduled a hearing.

What did the court decide?

Directed the employer not to take adverse action against the petitioner only on the ground that validation proceeding is pending.

Dinkar Bhaskar Koli Vs the State of… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Bombay HC (2021)

¶1

¶2

933-WP-3308-2021.odt

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

¶4

BENCH AT AURANGABAD

¶5

933 WRIT PETITION NO.3308 OF 2021

¶6

DINKAR BHASKAR KOLI

¶7

VERSUS

¶8

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR ITS SECRETARY AND OTHERS

¶9

Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. Jaybhay Bibhishan R.
Addl. GP for Respondents/State: Mr. P. S. Patil

¶10

CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA &
 SHRIKANT D. KULKARNI, JJ.

¶11

DATE : 23.02.2021

¶12

P.C. :

¶13

.The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that validation
proceeding in respect of the tribe claim of the petitioner is pending

¶14

with Scrutiny Committee. The same is yet not decided. The employer
is asking for the tribe validity certificate.

¶15

2.The learned Addl. Govt. Pleader accepts notice for Respondent
Nos.1 and 2 and submits that the validation proceeding of the
petitioner with the Committee is pending for final hearing and is fixed
on 03.03.2021.

¶16

3. The petitioner shall remain present before the Committee on

¶17

03.03.2021 and advance the arguments.

¶18

¶19

933-WP-3308-2021.odt

¶20

4. The Committee shall thereafter decide the proposal, preferably within a period of two months.

¶21

5.The employer shall not take adverse action against the
petitioner only on the ground that validation proceeding is pending.
The employer can take further course of action depending upon the
judgment that would be delivered by the Committee in the validation
proceedings.

¶22

6. Writ petition is disposed of. No costs.

¶23

(SHRIKANT D. KULKARNI, J.)

¶24

 (S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J.)

¶25

Sameer

Dinkar Bhaskar Koli v. the State of Maharashtra Thr Its Secretary and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dinkar Bhaskar Koli v. the State of Maharashtra Thr Its Secretary and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Gajanan Machhindra Nagre and Others Vs Union of India Thr the Secretary and Others

Arvind Sakhahari Bhawar Vs the State of Maharashtra Thr Its Secretary and Others

Shaikh Aaqeb Jawed Shaikh Iliyas Vs Education Officer Secondary and Others

Sai Shikshan Prasark Mandal Khatgaon Thr Its Secretary Balasaheb Ramrao Patil Khatgaonkar Vs the State of Maharashtra Thr Its Secretary and Others

Pankaj Subhash Fulsarre Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Sachin Tanaji Katewad Vs the State of Maharashtra and Another