Disposed

Sai Shikshan Prasark Mandal Khatgaon Thr Its Secretary Balasaheb Ramrao Patil Khatgaonkar v. the State of Maharashtra Thr Its Secretary and Others

Bombay HC23 Feb 2021WP/3303/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petition regarding grant of permission to start a class of 5th standard and correction of the year and funding basis of existing permission. The petition was disposed of with a direction to the respondent to decide the pending proposal within nine months.

What did the court decide?

The respondent shall decide the pending proposal on its own merits within a period of nine months.

Sai Shikshan Prasark Mandal Khatgaon Thr Its… — Education and Admissions | Bombay HC (2021)

¶1

¶2

928-WP-3303-2021.odt

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

¶4

BENCH AT AURANGABAD

¶5

928 WRIT PETITION NO.3303 OF 2021

¶6

SAI SHIKSHAN PRASARK MANDAL KHATGAON THR ITS
SECRETARY BALASAHEB RAMRAO PATIL KHATGAONKAR

¶7

VERSUS

¶8

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR ITS SECRETARY AND OTHERS

¶9

Advocate for Petitioners : Mr. G. R. Syed
AGP for Respondents/State: Mr. S. G. Karlekar

¶10

CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA & SHRIKANT D. KULKARNI, JJ.

¶11

DATE : 23.02.2021

¶12

P.C. :

¶13

.The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner
had applied for starting class of 5th standard from academic year 2012
– 2013. The petitioner is granted permission on self finance basis
from the year 2014-2015. The learned counsel further submits that
the petitioner has forwarded proposal for grant of the permission
from academic year 2012-2013 instead of 2015-2016, so also the
permission be granted on No Grant Post instead of Self Financial
Basis. The same is not decided.

¶14

2. The learned A.G.P. accepts notice for respondent Nos.1 to 4.

¶15

¶16

928-WP-3303-2021.odt

¶17

3.In case, the proposal filed by the petitioner for correction of the
permission granted to it that is the permission from the academic year
2012-2013 instead of 2015-2016 and for grant of the said permission
on No Grant Basis instead of Self Financial Basis is pending with
respondent No.1, then the respondent No.1 shall decide the same in
accordance with law, policy and procedure on its own merits,
preferably within a period of nine months.

¶18

4. Writ petition is disposed of. No costs.

¶19

(SHRIKANT D. KULKARNI, J.)

¶20

 (S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J.)

¶21

Sameer

Sai Shikshan Prasark Mandal Khatgaon Thr Its Secretary Balasaheb Ramrao Patil Khatgaonkar v. the State of Maharashtra Thr Its Secretary and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sai Shikshan Prasark Mandal Khatgaon Thr Its Secretary Balasaheb Ramrao Patil Khatgaonkar v. the State of Maharashtra Thr Its Secretary and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Gajanan Machhindra Nagre and Others Vs Union of India Thr the Secretary and Others

Arvind Sakhahari Bhawar Vs the State of Maharashtra Thr Its Secretary and Others

Shaikh Aaqeb Jawed Shaikh Iliyas Vs Education Officer Secondary and Others

Pankaj Subhash Fulsarre Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Sachin Tanaji Katewad Vs the State of Maharashtra and Another

Dinkar Bhaskar Koli Vs the State of Maharashtra Thr Its Secretary and Others