Partly allowed

Shivam Sport Association Social Organization, Mul, Chandrapur, Thr. Chairman Sanjay M. Kuntawar v. State of Maharashtra, Department of Home, Mumbai through Its Secretary and Another

Bombay HC2 Sept 2021WP/3304/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Writ petition allowed by consent. Court directed respondent No. 1 (State of Maharashtra Department of Home) to decide the petitioner's application dated 17/08/2021 within four weeks. No costs awarded.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner directed to have decision on application dated 17/08/2021 made by respondent No.1 within four weeks. Rule made returnable. No costs.

Shivam Sport Association Social Organization, Mul… — Service and Employment | Bombay HC (2021)

¶1

Judgment WP 3304.2021.odt

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH AT NAGPUR WRIT PETITION NO. 3304 OF 2021

¶3

Shivam Sport Association Social
Organization, Taluka Mul, District
Chandrapur, Through its Chairman
Sanjay Mahadevrao Kuntawar R/o Ward.. Petitioner
No.15 near Charkhasang at Mul,
Dist.Chandrapur – 441224

¶4

Versus

¶5

1. State of Maharashtra, Department of
Home, Mantralaya, Mumbai Through its
Secretary

¶6

.. Respondents

¶7

2. The Collector / District Magistrate,
Gadchiroli

¶8

Mr. Sayajee Jagtap, Advocate for petitioner.
Mr. A. A. Madiwale, A.G.P. for respondents.

¶9

 CORAM:SUNIL B. SHUKRE AND
ANIL S. KILOR, JJ.
DATED:02/09/2021

¶10

ORAL JUDGMENT(Per Sunil B. Shukre, J.)

¶11

Heard Mr.Sayajee Jagtap, learned counsel for the

¶12

petitioner and Mr.A.A.Madiwale, learned AGP for respondents.

¶13

(2) Rule . Rule made returnable forthwith. Heard

¶14

finally by consent of the learned counsel appearing for the parties.

¶15

PAGE 1 OF 2

¶16

KOLHE/P.A

¶17

Judgment WP 3304.2021.odt

¶18

(3) The prayer made in writ petition is not pressed by

¶19

learned counsel for the petitioner and now learned counsel for the
petitioner seeks appropriate directions of this Court in respect of the
application dated 17/08/2021, made by the petitioner to respondent
No.1.

¶20

(4) In view of the above, petition is partly allowed.

¶21

(5) The respondent No.1 is directed to decide the application dated 17/08/2021 filed by the petitioner in accordance with law, as early as possible, preferably within a period of four weeks from the date of the order.

¶22

(6) Rule accordingly. No costs.

¶23

[ANIL S. KILOR]

¶24

[SUNIL B. SHUKRE]

¶25

PAGE 2 OF 2

¶26

KOLHE/P.A

Shivam Sport Association Social Organization, Mul, Chandrapur, Thr. Chairman Sanjay M. Kuntawar v. State of Maharashtra, Department of Home, Mumbai through Its Secretary and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shivam Sport Association Social Organization, Mul, Chandrapur, Thr. Chairman Sanjay M. Kuntawar v. State of Maharashtra, Department of Home, Mumbai through Its Secretary and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Venus Multispecialty Hospital Pvt. Ltd., Nagpur and Others Vs the Debts Recovery Tribunal, Thr. Presiding Officer, Nagpur Bench, Nagpur and Another

Ambadas S/O Ramaji Dange Vs the Municipal Commissioner, Nagpur Municipal Corporation, Nagpur and Another

Tathagat Krida Mandal, through Its Secretary Gajanan @ Swami S/O Sitaram Nagdavane, Gondia Vs Muncipal Council, through Chief Officer, Gondia

Shri Tarun S/O Madanmohan Das and Another Vs the Authorised Officer, Allahabad Bank, Branch at Tiwari Sadan, Nagpur

Nirala Kumar Singh S/O Jai Prakash Singh Vs Punjab National Bank, Nagpur through Manager and Another

Sunil S/O Nandalal Malviya Vs Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd.(G.O.I. Enterprises) Mumbai and Another