Allowed

Ambadas S/O Ramaji Dange v. the Municipal Commissioner, Nagpur Municipal Corporation, Nagpur and Another

Bombay HC1 Sept 2021WP/2633/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This is a brief Writ Petition where the petitioner sought a decision on a representation. The High Court allowed the petition and directed the respondents to decide the matter within eight weeks.

What did the court decide?

Petition allowed. Respondents directed to decide the representation dated 25/06/2020 within eight weeks.

What the court decided

Ambadas S/O Ramaji Dange Vs the Municipal… — Writ and Judicial Review | Bombay HC (2021)

¶1

Judgment

¶2

¶3

wp2633.20.odt

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.

¶5

WRIT PETITION NO. 2633 OF 2020

¶6

Ambadas S/o. Ramaji Dange,
aged 59 years, Occ. Retired,
R/o. Nandanwan Zopadpatti,
Rajendra Nagar, Nagpur.

¶7

…. PETITIONER.

¶8

 // VERSUS //

¶9

1.The Municipal Commissioner, Nagpur Municipal Corporation, Nagpur, Civil Lines, Nagpur.

¶10

2.The Health Officer, Nagpur Municipal Corporation, Nagpur, Civil Lines, Nagpur.

¶11

…. RESPONDENTS.

¶12

______________________________________________________________
Shri I.G.Meshram, Advocate for Petitioner.
Shri S.N.Bhattad, Advocate for Respondent Nos.1 & 2.

¶13

 CORAM: SUNIL B. SHUKRE AND
ANIL S. KILOR, JJ.

¶14

DATED :SEPTEMBER 01, 2021

¶15

ORAL JUDGMENT : (Per : Sunil B. Shukre, J.)

¶16

1.Heard.

¶17

Judgment 2

¶18

wp2633.20.odt

¶19

2.RULE. Rule made returnable forthwith. Heard finally by
consent of the learned counsel for the parties.

¶20

3. The petitioner makes a limited prayer of seeking a decision on his representation dated 25/06/2020 at the earliest.

¶21

4. Considering the nature of the prayer, we are inclined to allow the petition.

¶22

5.The petition is allowed. Respondent Nos.1 and 2 are directed
to decide the representation dated 25/06/2020 made by the petitioner,
at the earliest, in accordance with law, preferably within eight weeks

¶23

from the date of the order.

¶24

Rule accordingly. No costs.

¶25

( ANIL S. KILOR, J ) ( SUNIL B. SHUKRE, J.)

¶26

RRaut..

Ambadas S/O Ramaji Dange v. the Municipal Commissioner, Nagpur Municipal Corporation, Nagpur and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

Ambadas S/O Ramaji Dange v. the Municipal Commissioner, Nagpur Municipal Corporation, Nagpur and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Nitin Balkrushanaji Dange Vs State of Maharashtra, through Secretary, Tribal Development Department, Mumbai and Others

Dr. Sau. Manik Narayanrao Mehare Vs State of Maharashtra, Thr. Secretary, Higher and Technical Education Dept. and Others

Dr. Lata Subhash Agale Vs State of Maharashtra through Secretary Higher and Technical Education Department, Mumbai and Others

Venus Multispecialty Hospital Pvt. Ltd., Nagpur and Others Vs the Debts Recovery Tribunal, Thr. Presiding Officer, Nagpur Bench, Nagpur and Another

Tathagat Krida Mandal, through Its Secretary Gajanan @ Swami S/O Sitaram Nagdavane, Gondia Vs Muncipal Council, through Chief Officer, Gondia

Major (Dr.) Shilpa Maroti Kharapkar Vs State of Maharashtra, Thr. Secretary, Dept. of General Administration, Mumbai and Others