Court dismissed writ petition as withdrawn by petitioner after confirmation that competent authority had already decided the application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
39-wp-3289-2021.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.3289 OF 2021
VISHAL SUBHASH PAREKAR
Digitally signed by VISHAL SUBHASH PAREKAR Date: 2021.09.30 13:25:04 +0530
Swapnil Sambhaji Khatpe
vs.
The State of Maharashtra and Anr.
Ms. Sharda Chate, for the Petitioner
Mrs. S.D. Shinde, APP for the Respondent-State.
...Petitioner
...Respondents
CORAM : S. S. SHINDE &
N. J. JAMADAR, JJ.
DATE : SEPTEMBER 29, 2021 (THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCING)
P.C.:
leave to withdraw the petition as the application of the petitioner
has already been decided by the competent authority.
(N. J. JAMADAR, J.)
1/1
Vishal Parekar
VISHAL SUBHASH PAREKAR
The State of Maharashtra
S. S. SHINDE
N. J. JAMADAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
