A writ petitioner sought habeas corpus to produce respondent no.7 with whom he had solemnized marriage. The petition was dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to challenge the underlying magistrate's order, and costs were not awarded as the petitioner had previously invoked writ jurisdiction in Rajasthan.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
917-CRIWP2047-2021.DOC
Santosh
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO. 2047 OF 2021
Mithesh Suresh Parmar ...Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra & ors. ...Respondents
Mr. Ganesh Bhujbal, for the Petitioner. Smt. A. S. Pai, PP for the State/Respondent no.1. Ms. Racheeta R. Dhuru, for Respondent nos.5 to 7.
CORAM: S. S. SHINDE & N. J. JAMADAR, JJ DATED: 28th SEPTEMBER, 2021
PC:-
for Rajasthan at Jodhpur. A copy of the order passed by a Division Bench of Rajasthan High Court on 19th May,2021 was
1/3
917-CRIWP2047-2021.DOC
tendered for the perusal of the Court.
2/3
917-CRIWP2047-2021.DOC
appropriate to saddle the petitioner with costs.
[N. J. JAMADAR, J.]
[S. S. SHINDE, J.]
3/3
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to exercise discretion to award costs given the petitioner had already sought identical relief before the Rajasthan High Court.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Mithesh Suresh Parmar
The State of Maharashtra
S. S. Shinde
N. J. Jamadar
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
