Partly allowed

Rajendra S/O. Wamanrao Dhote and Others v. Director, Nagpur Mahanagar Metro Regional Devpt. Authority (Nmmrda), Nagpur and Others

Bombay HC2 Sept 2021WP/3289/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This is a writ petition concerning public road encroachments. The Court held that notice to all respondents was unnecessary and partly allowed the petition, directing the collector to decide a petitioners' representation on encroachment removal within four weeks. No costs awarded.

What did the court decide?

Respondent No.3 is directed to decide the petitioners' representation on encroachment removal expeditiously, preferably within four weeks of receipt.

Rajendra S/O. Wamanrao Dhote and Others Vs Director… — Landlord and Tenant | Bombay HC (2021)

¶1

4-wp 3289-21-

¶2

1/5

¶3

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH, NAGPUR.

¶4

WRIT PETITION NO. 3289 OF 2021

¶5

PETITIONERS:- 1.Rajendra Wamanrao Dhote, Age 45 yrs, Occ. Business, R/o.Plot No.31, Shivaji Colony, Hudkeshwr Road, Near Nasre Mangal Karyalay, Nagpur. Mob.No.9923195311.

¶6

2.Hemraj Birju Mohariya, Age 67 yrs, Occ.Nil, R/o Plot No.55 b, Shaktimata Nagar, Kharbi Road, Near Water Tank, Nagpur Pin 44009, Mob. No. 7721858424.

¶7

3.Narendra Anantrao Nandanwar, Age 57 yrs, Occ. Retired, R/0 No.126 Kamgarnagar, Near New Nandanwan, Nagpur. Mob.No.9422805537.

¶8

4.Chandrashekhar Ramchandra Gaupale, Age 52 yrs, Occ.Service, R/o.29, Prashant Nagar, Corporation Colony, Wardha Road, Near Central Jail, Nagpur. Mob. No.9423682661.

¶9

5.Sandeep Hemraj Mohariya, Age 34 yrs, Occ.Private Service, R/o Plot No.55b,Shaktimatanagar, Khrbi Road, near water Tank, Nagpur pin 44009.Mob. No.9819949785.

¶10

...VERSUS...

Kavita

4-wp 3289-21-

2/5

RESPONDENTS:- 1.Director, Nagpur Mahanagar Metro Regional Development Authority (NMMRDA), Sub Division Office, Krida Chowk, Hanumannagar, Nagpur.

¶15

2.Collector, Nagpur. Office at:Civil Lines Nagpur-440001.

¶16

3.Tahsildar (Nagpur Gramin),

¶17

Office at:Civil Lines Nagpur-440001.

¶18

4.Secretary, Gram Panchayat, BesaBeltarodi, Besa, Nagpur.

¶19

5. Shaikh Mehbood Shaikh Mehboob, age Major, President, Manavshakti Gruhnirman Sanstha, Nagpur R/o Opposite to Panchwati Vruddhashram, Azad Colony, Bada Tajbaug, Umred Road, Nagpur. Mob.No.9822427865, 07122741228.

¶20

6.Walmik Pundlikrao Ambekar, Age 65 yrs, R/o “Annapurna,” 34, Surve Layout, Opposite Chhota Tajbaug, Nagpur 440024. Mob.No. 9822262478.

¶21

7. Pradeep Lalchand Verma, Age 40 yrs, Occup. Service, r/o Plot No. 13, Ashirvad Nagar, Hudkeshwar Road, Nagpur.

¶22

8. Rajeshri Nilesh Kate, age 33 yrs, Occ. Nil R/o Near Chhatrapati Sabhagruh, Gentech- The Force, 1^st Floor, Chhatrapati Square, Nagpur.

¶23

9.Vaishali Umakant Rothe, Age 36 yrs., Occup. Nil R/o Near Chhatrapati

Kavita

4-wp 3289-21-

3/5

Sabhagruh, Genetech- The G Force, 1st
Floor, Chhatrapati Square, Nagpur.

¶28

10.Shobha Shankarrao Mamidwar, agemajor, R/o Plot No.60, Manavshakti Gruhnirman Sanstha, Besa, Nagpur. Mob.No.9765606258.

¶29

11. Vandna Shankarrao Anturkar, age Major, Occ Nil, R/o Plot No.33, Chandranagar, near Bhagwan nagar, Nagpur. Mob.No. 9422104124.

¶30

12.Pravin Ramchandra Ninave, age Major, Occ. Service, R/o Central institute of Fisheries Education,Off Yari Road, Panch Marg, Varsova, Mumbai, Pin-400061. Mob. No.9967803876.

¶31

13.Sheela Narendra Belsare, age Major, Occ.Nil, R/o Plot No.55, Manavshakti Gruhniramna Sanstha, Besa, Nagpur, Mob.No.8554877623.

¶32

14. Ramesh Dhondbaji Palsapure, age Major ,Occup.Labour, R/o 243, Laxminagar, near Digambar Jain Samaj, Nagpur.

¶33

Mr.S.V. Deshmukh, counsel for petitioner.

¶34

 Ms.K.S. Joshi, G.P for respondent Nos.2 and 3.

¶35

CORAM : SUNIL B.SHUKRE &

¶36

 ANIL S.KILOR, JJ.

¶37

 DATE : 02.09.2021

Kavita

4-wp 3289-21-

4/5

O R A L J U D G M E N T (Per : Sunil B.Shukre, J.)

¶42

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned

¶43

GP for respondent Nos.2 and 3, who appears by waiving notice.

¶44

2.In our opinion, there is no need to issue any notice to
the remaining respondents as the main grievance of the
petitioners is that no action nor any decision is being taken after
the petitioners made representations to respondent Nos.2 and 3
for removal of the encroachments made on public road by
respondent Nos. 5 to 14.

¶45

3. Hence, Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. Heard

¶46

finally by consent of the learned counsel appearing for the parties
present before this Court.

¶47

4.An alternate relief, regarding issuance of appropriate
direction to the respondent Nos.2 and 3 has been sought. The Writ
Petition is, therefore, partly allowed. Respondent No.3 is directed
to decide the representation dated 08.06.2021 filed by the

¶48

Kavita

¶49

4-wp 3289-215/5

¶50

petitioners, and which has been forwarded to him by respondent
No.2, vide his letter dated 29.01.2021, in accordance with law as
expeditiously as possible preferably within four weeks from the
date of the receipt of the order.

¶51

5. Rule accordingly. No costs.

¶52

 (ANIL S. KILOR,J) (SUNIL B. SHUKRE,J)

¶53

Kavita

Rajendra S/O. Wamanrao Dhote and Others v. Director, Nagpur Mahanagar Metro Regional Devpt. Authority (Nmmrda), Nagpur and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rajendra S/O. Wamanrao Dhote and Others v. Director, Nagpur Mahanagar Metro Regional Devpt. Authority (Nmmrda), Nagpur and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Venus Multispecialty Hospital Pvt. Ltd., Nagpur and Others Vs the Debts Recovery Tribunal, Thr. Presiding Officer, Nagpur Bench, Nagpur and Another

Ambadas S/O Ramaji Dange Vs the Municipal Commissioner, Nagpur Municipal Corporation, Nagpur and Another

Tathagat Krida Mandal, through Its Secretary Gajanan @ Swami S/O Sitaram Nagdavane, Gondia Vs Muncipal Council, through Chief Officer, Gondia

Shri Tarun S/O Madanmohan Das and Another Vs the Authorised Officer, Allahabad Bank, Branch at Tiwari Sadan, Nagpur

Nirala Kumar Singh S/O Jai Prakash Singh Vs Punjab National Bank, Nagpur through Manager and Another

Sunil S/O Nandalal Malviya Vs Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd.(G.O.I. Enterprises) Mumbai and Another