This writ petition concerning time-bound promotional pay scales in service was disposed of by directing the respondent to decide pending proposals within six months on merits.
Direction to the respondent to decide pending proposals on their own merits within a period of six months from the date of order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 30-wp 2953-2021.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 2953 OF 2021
Sanjay Vitthalrao Kamble
and others
.. Petitioners
Versus
The State of Maharashtra and others
.. Respondents
Mr. Vilas S. Panpatte, Advocate for the Petitioners.
Mrs. V. S. Chaudhary, AGP for Respondent Nos. 1 and 2.
CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA & SHRIKANT D. KULKARNI, JJ.
DATED : 15th February, 2021.
PER COURT:-
.The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the
proposals are forwarded to the respondent No. 2 by the institution, so
also individual applications have been made for grant of higher pay
scale after completion of 12 years service by the petitioner nos. 1 to 3
and 24 years service by the petitioner no. 4. The petitioner no. 4 also
submitted proposal for benefit of time bound promotional pay scale
after completing 24 years service.
2. We have also heard the learned A.G.P. for respondent Nos. 1 and
2.
1 of 2
2 30-wp 2953-2021.odt
3.In case, the proposals seeking time bound promotional pay scale
after completion of 12 years service (page no. 50) of petitioner nos. 1
to 3 and for time bound promotional pay scale after completion of 24
years of service (page no. 65) of petitioner no. 4 are pending with
respondent No. 2, then respondent No. 2 shall take decision on its own
merits, in accordance with law, expeditiously and preferably within a
period of six (06) months from today.
4. Writ petition is disposed of. No costs.
( SHRIKANT D. KULKARNI )( S. V. GANGAPURWALA )
JUDGE JUDGE
P.S.B.
2 of 2
Sanjay Vitthalrao Kamble and others
The State of Maharashtra
S. V. Gangapurwala
Shrikant D. Kulkarni
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court