Petitioner sought directions to furnish CCTV footage and CDR via pending representations. Court directed authorities to decide representations within four weeks as they remained pending for over a year.
Directing respondents to decide pending representations on furnishing CCTV footage and CDR within four weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
25.wp-357-21.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.357 OF 2021
Dr. Reza Borhani Shidani …. Petitioner Versus The State of Maharashtra and another …. Respondents
Mr. P.M. Havnur, Advocate a/w. Sanjay Kharat, for the Petitioner. Mrs. A.S. Pai, Public Prosecutor a/w. S.D. Shinde, APP for the Respondent-State.
CORAM : NITIN JAMDAR AND SARANG V. KOTWAL, JJ. DATE : 09 DECEMBER 2021
P.C.
The Petitioner has sought two reliefs – (i) to consider the representations of the Petitioner dated 4 November 2020 (Exhibit-B) and 13 November 2020 (Exhibit-D) and (ii) direction to the Respondent No.2 the Commissioner of Police, Mumbai to furnish C.D.R. and C.C.T.V. footage as specified in the petition.
1 / 2
2
25.wp-357-21.odt
PRADIPKUMAR PRAKASHRAO DESHMANE
Digitally signed by PRADIPKUMAR PRAKASHRAO DESHMANE Date: 2021.12.14 11:45:12 +0530
(SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.) (NITIN JAMDAR, J.)
Deshmane (PS)
2 / 2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether pending representations seeking supply of C.D.R. and C.C.T.V. footage require adjudication within a specified timeframe to ensure effective remedy.
Dr. Reza Borhani Shidani
The State of Maharashtra
The Commissioner of Police, Mumbai
SARANG V. KOTWAL
NITIN JAMDAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court