Disposed

Ashish Vinod Dalal and Ors. v. Vinod Ramanlal Dalal and Ors.

Bombay HC15 Sept 2021WP/2400/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court in chamber corrected clerical and grammatical errors in an order passed by the Maintenance Tribunal granting relief to senior citizens under the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007.

What did the court decide?

Deleted inconsistent words, corrected number formatting and spelling errors in the impugned order and directed issuance of a corrected copy.

Ashish Vinod Dalal and Ors. Vs Vinod Ramanlal Dalal… — Maintenance and Alimony | Bombay HC (2021)

¶1

VIDYASURESHAMIN Digitallysigned byVIDYASURESH AMINDate:2021.09.1615:32:04+0530

¶2

10wp2400-21speaking.doc

¶3

Vidya Amin

¶4

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

¶5

WRIT PETITION NO.2400 OF 2021

¶6

Ashish Vinod Dalal & Ors.… Petitioners
V/s.
Vinod Ramanlal Dalal & Ors.… Respondents

¶7

Mr.Yashpal Thakur i/b. Mr.Surendra Raja with Mr.Mukund Pandya, for
the Petitioner.

¶8

Mr.Abhay Khandeparkar, Senior Advocate i/b. Mr.Kunal Tiwari, for
Respondent Nos.1 and 2.

¶9

Ms.Vaishali Nimbalkar, AGP for the State.

¶10

 CORAM : G.S.KULKARNI, J.
 (In Chamber at 2.10 p.m.)
 DATE : 16 September, 2021.

¶11

PC:

¶12

1.Not on board, taken on board for speaking to the minutes of the
order dated 15 September 2021.

¶13

2.In paragraph (1) of the said order, the following portion be
deleted:

¶14

“1.This is a sad case ……. The operative part of the impugned
order reads thus:”

¶15

and substituted by the following paragraph:

¶16

“1.This is a sad case where petitioner no.1 alongwith his
wife-petitioner no.2 and their daughter-petitioner no.3 have
dragged his parents-respondent nos.1 and 2, who are aged 90
years and 89 years respectively, in protracted legal proceedings.
It appears that as a last resort, respondent nos.1 and 2
(hereinafter referred to as “parents”) invoked the provisions of

¶17

1 / 2

¶18

10wp2400-21speaking.doc

¶19

Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act,
2007 (for short “the Senior Citizens Act”) on which the
impugned order has been passed by the Presiding Officer of the
Maintenance Tribunal (for short “the tribunal”) granting relief
to the parents, against which the petitioners have filed this
petition. The impugned order reads thus:-”

¶20

3. In paragraph (2), eighth line the word “the” be deleted; and in tenth line the words “the possession” be deleted and be substituted by “possession”.

¶21

4. On page 4 in paragraph (5), sixth line the word “that” be deleted.

¶22

5. On page 6, first line, the words “nos.1 ad 2.” be deleted and substituted by “nos.1 and 2.”

¶23

6. On page 8, second last line, the letter “a” be deleted.

¶24

7. On page 10 in paragraph (14) ninth line the word “of” be deleted and substituted by “to them”.

¶25

8.Order be corrected accordingly, and corrected copy be made
available to the parties.

¶26

(G.S.KULKARNI, J.)

¶27

2 / 2

Ashish Vinod Dalal and Ors. v. Vinod Ramanlal Dalal and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ashish Vinod Dalal and Ors. v. Vinod Ramanlal Dalal and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Dilip Manik Kashid and Ors. Vs Pandurang Shankar Gaikwad and Ors.

Najim Khalil Shaikh and Ors. Vs Nashik Zilla Girna Sahakari Bank Co-Op Bank Limited Nashik and Ors.

Kuberdas Pilaji Kanerkar Deceased Santosh Kuberdas Kanerkar Vs the Special Land Acquisition Officer and Ors.

Khemson Agencies Vs Mondelez India Foods Ltd. and Anr.

Progressive Education Society , through Its Chairperson Vs Joint Charity Commissioner - I

Raju Somu Rathod and Ors. Vs the State of Maharashtra through Tahsildar Khanapur Vita and Ors.