This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Digitally signed by PRASHANTVILASRANE PRASHANTVILAS RANEDate:2021.09.16 16:08:05 +0530
pvr 4-IA2323-21=wp5548-21.doc
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
WRIT PETITION NO.5548 OF 2021
and
INTERIM APPLICATION NO.2323 OF 2021
IN
WRIT PETITION NO.5548 OF 2021
Mr.Raju Somu Rathod & Ors..… Petitioners
V/s.
The State of Maharashtra & Ors.… Respondents
Mr. Laxman K.Kalel, for the Petitioners.
Mr.S.H.Kankal, AGP for the State.
CORAM : G.S.KULKARNI, J.
DATE : 15th September, 2021.
P.C.:
1. Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioners and learned AGP for the State.
2.Challenge in this petition is to an interim order dated 10 March
2021 passed by the Mamlatdar. It is accepted by the learned Counsel
for the petitioners that an alternative remedy of revision is available to
the petitioners under the provisions of Section 23(2) of the
Mamlatdars’ Courts Act,1906. It is also open to the petitioners to
appear before the Tahasildar and by filing a reply to any interim
1 / 2
pvr 4-IA2323-21=wp5548-21.doc
application filed by respondent nos.5 to 6 and contest the application
and/or seek vacating of the ad-interim order as assailed in this petition.
It is for the petitioners to decide to adopt appropriate course of action.
3. The petition is accordingly disposed of with liberty to the petitioners to pursue appropriate proceedings. All contentions of the petitioners are expressly kept open.
4. Interim application also would not survive. It is accordingly disposed of.
2 / 2
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Mr. Raju Somu Rathod & Ors.
The State of Maharashtra & Ors.
G.S. Kulkarni
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court