Mrs. Sonale Veejhay Magdum Vs Union of India and Anr.

1 Heard. The learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that as per order dated 30.03.2021 he has served both the Respondents and filed Affidavit of Service. In spite of that none appeared for them.

¶14

2 By this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India the Petitioner is seeking direction against the Respondents to consider their candidature under the provisions of the Notary Act 1952 and the Notary Rules for appointing him as a Notary in view of the representation dated 17.10.2018 and 18.07.2019.

¶15

3 Though the Respondents are duly served twice, none appeared for them.

Basavraj G. Patil

1/2

8.2380.20-wp.odt

4 Considering these facts, the petition can be disposed of with direction to the Respondent to consider these representations on merits.

¶20

5 Hence, following order is passed:

¶21

a. The Respondents to consider representations dated 17.10.2018 and 18.07.2019 on merits as early as possible but in any case on or before 30.06.2021 and inform the decision thereon to the Petitioner.

¶22

b. The Petitioner is directed to serve a copy of this order to the Respondents on or before 30.04.2021.

¶23

c With these directions, the Writ Petition stands disposed of.

¶24

(RIYAZ I. CHAGLA, J.)

¶25

(K.K.TATED, J.)

¶26

Basavraj G. Patil

¶27

2/2

Mrs. Sonale Veejhay Magdum v. Union of India and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mrs. Sonale Veejhay Magdum v. Union of India and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Manohar Hiru Porte Son of Shri. Hiru Porte Vs the Assistant General Manager Bank of India and Ors.

Sunil Shankar Jadhav Vs the Thane Municipal Corporation and Ors.

Dongarsingh Madhukar Thakur Vs State of Maharashtra and Ors.

Sanjay Suresh Adesara Vs Nashik Municipal Corp. Thru Commissioner and Ors.

Ramesh Manikrao Sasane Vs the States of Maharashtra Thr. Its Secretary and Anr.

Mrs. Sonale Veejhay Magdum Vs Union of India and Anr.