Civil application for early hearing of a writ petition, where substantive parties had expired, dismissed with liberty to file when the writ petition is ready for final hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
904.189.19-caw.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE SIDE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.189/2019 IN WRIT PETITION NO.10296/2010
Sanjay Suresh Adesara
….. Applicant
Vs.
Nashik Municipal Corporation & Ors. ….. Respondents
Mr. Maheshwar A. Parab i/b Pravartak Pathak for the Applicant
CORAM: K.K.TATED & RIYAZ I. CHAGLA, JJ.
DATED : APRIL 9, 2021 (VIDEO CONFERENCING)
P.C.
1 Heard. The learned counsel for the Applicant submits that by this Civil Application, the Applicant is seeking early hearing of the Writ Petition. He submits that Respondent No.3 and Respondent No.10 expired. He seeks some time to take out appropriate steps to bring their legal heirs on record.
2 Office note shows that the Writ Petition is not yet ready for final hearing.
Basavraj G. Patil
1/2
904.189.19-caw.odt
(RIYAZ I. CHAGLA, J.)
(K.K.TATED, J.)
Basavraj G. Patil
2/2
Sanjay Suresh Adesara
Nashik Municipal Corporation
K.K. Tated
Riyaz I. Chagla
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
