The High Court at Aurangabad allowed the petitioner to withdraw Writ Petition No. 3332 of 2021, granting liberty to take further legal steps, with no costs awarded.
Leave to withdraw the Writ Petition with liberty to file further steps.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
(1)
1014-wp-3332-2021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO.3332 OF 2021
BALA SAMPAT JADHAV
..PETITIONER
VERSUS
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS..RESPONDENTS
Mr. Omgashad B. Boinwad h/f Mr. Yogesh R. Suradkar,
Advocate for the Petitioner.
Mrs. M. A. Deshpande, AGP for Respondents-State.
Smt. Anjali Dube (Bajpai), Advocate for Respondent
No.3.
… CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA & R. N. LADDHA, JJ. DATED : 01st OCTOBER, 2021.
PER COURT:-
1.The learned counsel for the petitioner
submits that, after filing of writ petition, the
certificate of the petitioner is canceled on the
ground of nomenclature.
2.The learned counsel seeks leave to
withdraw the Writ Petition with liberty to the
petitioner to take further steps.
3.Writ Petition is disposed of as withdrawn.
NO costs.
4.The petitioner may take further steps as
permissible under law.
Devendra/October-2021
Bala Sampat Jadhav
The State of Maharashtra and Others
S. V. Gangapurwala
R. N. Laddha
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court