This single-line order records the mention of an application, feels the need to wait for the authority to act expeditiously, and dismisses the writ petition with costs allowed.
No costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1007-wp-2187-21
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 2187 OF 2021 WITH CA/2516/2021 IN WP/2187/2021
Sandip Ravindra Kshirsagar... Petitioner.
Versus
State of Maharashtra... Respondent.
Mr. Sayyed Tauseef Yaseen, Advocate for the Petitioner.
Mr. P.K. Lakhotiya, A.G.P. for Respondent No.1
CORAM : S.V. GANGAPURWALA AND SHRIKANT D. KULKARNI, JJ.
DATE : 03rd MARCH, 2021
PER COURT:-
1.Mr. Lakhotiya, learned A.G.P., on instructions, submits that
within 2-3 days, the matter filed by the petitioner would be numbered
and thereafter within eight (08) days, the matter would be proceeded
for issuing notices and the matter would be proceeded further.
2.In view of the statement made upon instructions, we are not
considering the other aspects of the matter. We hope and trust that
the authority before whom the matter is filed by the petitioner would
deal with in accordance with law, expeditiously.
1 of 2
1007-wp-2187-21
2
3. The writ petition is disposed of. No costs.
4. In view of disposal of the writ petition, the civil application is also disposed of.
( SHRIKANT D. KULKARNI ) ( S.V. GANGAPURWALA ) JUDGE JUDGE
S.P. Rane
2 of 2
Sandip Ravindra Kshirsagar
State of Maharashtra
S.V. Gangapurwala
Shrikant D. Kulkarni
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court