Dismissed

Swapnil Prakash Gulzerwad v. the State of Maharashtra Thr Its Secretary and Others

Bombay HC2 Mar 2021WP/3899/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner sought printing of marksheet despite pending tribe validation since 2016. Committee directed Respondent Committee to decide expeditiously and issue marksheet if eligible, barring misconduct.

What did the court decide?

Respondent Committee directed to decide validation expeditiously; marksheet to be issued if eligible and without withholding on pending validation; degree pending validity certificate.

Swapnil Prakash Gulzerwad Vs the State of… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Bombay HC (2021)

¶1

1 wp 3899.21

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD

¶3

WRIT PETITION NO. 3899 OF 2021

¶4

Swapnil Prakash Gulzerwad .. Petitioner

¶5

Versus

¶6

The State of Maharashtra and others .. Respondents

¶7

Shri G. K. Chinchole, Advocate h/f Shri S. M. Vibhute, Advocate for the Petitioner. Shri S. K. Tambe, A.G.P. for Respondent Nos. 1 to 3.

¶8

CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA AND SHRIKANT D. KULKARNI, JJ. DATE : 02ND MARCH, 2021.

¶9

FINAL ORDER :

¶10

. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that, validation proceeding in respect of tribe claim of the petitioner is pending since the year 2016. The petitioner has completed B. Tech. (Mechanical Engineering) course. The marks sheet, passing certificate and all other documents are not issued to the petitioner only on the ground that validity certificate is not submitted.

¶11

The learned Assistant Government Pleader accepts notice for respondent Nos. 1 to 3.

¶12

Considering the fact that, validation proceeding is still pending, we pass following order.

¶13

2 wp 3899.21

¶14

The respondent No. 2/Committee shall decide the validation proceeding in respect of tribe claim of the petitioner on its own merits, in accordance with law, expeditiously and preferably within a period of four (04) months from the date of appearance of the petitioner. The petitioner shall appear before the Committee on 16.03.2021. In case the petitioner is otherwise eligible then the respondent Nos. 2 and 3 shall not withhold the marks sheet of the petitioner only on the ground that validation proceeding is pending. The respondents shall not issue degree certificate and other documents unless and until the validity certificate is submitted by the petitioner. The respondents may take further course of action depending upon the judgment that would be delivered by the Committee in the validation proceeding.

¶15

In the light of the above, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs.

¶16

[SHRIKANT D. KULKARNI, J.] [S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J.]

¶17

bsb/March 21

Swapnil Prakash Gulzerwad v. the State of Maharashtra Thr Its Secretary and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Swapnil Prakash Gulzerwad v. the State of Maharashtra Thr Its Secretary and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Pushpa Bhaskar Khule Thr Her Power of Attorney Holder Bhaskarrao Tatyarao Khule Vs the State of Maharashtra Thr the Commissioner and Others

Mukteshwar Keshavrao Dhondage Vs Keshavrao Shankarrao Dhondage and Others

Dhondiba Govindrao Salunke Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Sweeta Vinayak Pawar Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Madhukar Anandrao Pitle Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others

Rupali Durgadas Thakur Vs the State of Maharashtra and Others