Writ petitioner sought transfer from unaided to aided post. High Court quashed the rejection partially and directed Education Officer to reconsider the proposal in tune with a prior judgment, usually within four months.
Impugned order quashed; Education Officer directed to reconsider transfer proposal within four months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
930
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
930 WRIT PETITION NO.1931 OF 2021
RAJABHAU LAXMAN AWAD
VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
Advocate for Petitioner: Mr. A. D. Sonkawade h/for Mr. Chaudhari Nitin K AGP for respondents/State: Mr S R Yadav Lonikar
CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA & SHRIKANT D. KULKARNI, JJ. DATE : 2nd February, 2021
ORDER :
from unaided to aided post is rejected basically on the basis of the Circular dated 28.06.2016.
(SHRIKANT D. KULKARNI, J.) (S.V.GANGAPURWALA, J.)
JPC
Page 1 of 1
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the rejection of the proposal for transfer from unaided to aided post should be reconsidered in light of existing judgment.
Whether the clauses of Circular dated 28.06.2016 that were held inapplicable in a prior writ petition should govern the current decision.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Writ petition No. 1493 of 2018Relied on¶3
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Rajabhau Laxman Awad
The State of Maharashtra
S. V. Gangapurwala
Shrikant D. Kulkarni
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
