High Court granted notice, waived by respondents. Court directed respondent No.3 to decide pending appointment proposal for petitioner No.1 as Junior clerk within four months before disposing writ petition.
Notice issued and waived; respondent No.3 directed to decide appointment proposal within four months.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
928
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
928 WRIT PETITION NO.1929 OF 2021
DINESH SHANTARAM DHIVARE AND ANOTHER
VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
Advocate for Petitioners: Ms Pradnya S. Taleker i/by Talekar And Associates
AGP for respondents/State: Mr S G Karlekar
CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA & SHRIKANT D. KULKARNI, JJ. DATE : 2nd February, 2021
ORDER :
to the appointment of petitioner No.1 as Junior clerk is not yet decided.
(SHRIKANT D. KULKARNI, J.) (S.V.GANGAPURWALA, J.)
JPC
Page 1 of 1
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the proposal for appointment of petitioner No.1 as Junior clerk is pending.
Whether respondent No.3 is directed to decide the proposal on its own merits within four months.
DINESH SHANTARAM DHIVARE
ANOTHER
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
S. V. GANGAPURWALA
SHRIKANT D. KULKARNI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
