This is a brief order disposing of a writ petition. The court dismissed the petition as the Gramsabha had negated the 'no confidence motion' against the petitioner, causing the challenge to fail.
Writ petition disposed of; no costs awarded.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
.. 1 ..
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
1060 Writ Petition No.1922 Of 2021
Rangnath Ramdas Patil
.. Petitioner
Versus
The State Of Maharashtra
Thr Its Principal Secretary and Others
.. Respondents
Mr S.S. Thombre, Advocate for the Petitioner
Mr S.G. Karlekar, AGP for Respondent Nos.1 to 3
Mr G.D. Jain, Advocate for Respondent No.4
Mr V.Y. Patil, Advocate for Respondent Nos.5 to 13
CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA
AND
R.N. LADDHA, JJ.
DATE : 09-09-2021
PER COURT : -
1. Heard the learned Counsel appearing for the respective parties.
2. It is submitted that the Gramsabha has negatived the resolution
of the 'no confidence motion' against the petitioner.3. In view of that 'no confidence motion' against the petitioner fails, writ petition is disposed of. No costs.
4. Needless to state, as 'no confidence motion' against the petitioner has failed, further consequences would follow.
[ R.N. LADDHA ] [ S. V. GANGAPURWALA ]
JUDGE JUDGE
Gajanan
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the writ petition challenging the failure of the no confidence motion against the petitioner requires disposal.
What is the consequence of the Gramsabha negating the resolution of the no confidence motion against the petitioner.
Rangnath Ramdas Patil
The State Of Maharashtra
S. V. GANGAPURWALA
R.N. LADDHA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court