Pending Writ Petition No. 1848 of 2017 was disposed of as the interim order served the purpose of the petition. No costs were awarded.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1 943-wp 1848-2017.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD
WRIT PETITION NO. 1848 OF 2017
Abasaheb Eknath Solanke
.. Petitioner
Versus
The State of Maharashtra and others
.. Respondents
Mr. Swapnil D. Tawshikar, Advocate for the Petitioner.
Mr. S. G. Karlekar, AGP for Respondent Nos. 1 and 2.
Mr. V. S. Kadam, Advocate for Respondent No. 3.
Mr. V. A. Bagdiya, Advocate for Respondent No. 4.
CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA &
R. N. LADDHA, JJ.
DATED : 08th September, 2021.
PER COURT:-
.Mr. Tawshikar, learned counsel submits that in view of the
interim order passed in the present matter, the purpose of the petition
is served.
2. Writ petition is disposed of. No costs.
( R. N. LADDHA )( S. V. GANGAPURWALA )
JUDGE JUDGE
P.S.B.
1 of 1
Abasaheb Eknath Solanke
The State of Maharashtra
R. N. Laddha
S. V. Gangapurwala
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court