Single judge bench dismissed a writ petition contesting inclusion in the election candidate list. The court held that immediate interference was unwarranted given the availability of election petition remedies post-results.
None
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
wp-285-2021-25.odt
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY NAGPUR BENCH : NAGPUR
Writ Petition No. 285 of 2021
Sau. Venutai W/o Deepak Bhandekar
… Petitioner
Versus
State of Maharashtra, through its Secretary,
Urban Development Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai-32 and others … Respondent/s
Mr. Ganesh N. Khanzode, Advocate for the Petitioner.
Mr. A.M. Deshpande, Assistant Government Pleader for the Respondent Nos. 1 to 3.
CORAM : NITIN JAMDAR AND ANIL S. KILOR, JJ.
DATED : 14 JANUARY 2021
P.C.:
Heard learned Counsel for the Petitioner.
SKNair
2 wp-285-2021-25.odt
[ANIL S. KILOR, J.] [NITIN JAMDAR, J.]
SKNair
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the High Court was warranted in interfering with the inclusion of the petitioner's name in the final list of candidates for the Gram Panchayat election.
Sau. Venutai W/o Deepak Bhandekar
State of Maharashtra
Nitin Jamdar
Anil S. Kilor
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
